Singer Nadine Shah blasts streaming services payments for poor pay

‘I’m struggling to pay my rent’: Singer Nadine Shah blasts payments from streaming services and says she barely earns enough to survive

A singer has told MPs that her earnings from music streaming platforms are not enough to keep ‘the wolf away from the door’.

Songwriter Nadine Shah said there was a lack of transparency over pay in the music industry.

Miss Shah, 34, also told a Government inquiry into streaming that despite her successes, including a Mercury Prize nomination in 2018, she struggled to pay her rent.

The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee is looking into the effects of the revenue model on artists. 

Nadine Shah has told MPs that her earnings from music streaming platforms are not enough to keep ‘the wolf away from the door’

Miss Shah said: ‘I don’t feel that it is that transparent. I could be asked many questions about the intricacies of what I earn and how many streams.

‘All I do know is that my earnings from my streaming, they are not significant enough to keep the wolf away from the door.

‘I am in a position as an artist with a substantial profile, a substantial fanbase, critically acclaimed, but I don’t make enough money from streaming, I am in a position now where I am struggling to pay my rent.’

The DCMS Committee is looking into how the streaming model has affected artists and record labels, following increased scrutiny prompted by the coronavirus pandemic.

Miss Shah (pictured), 34, also told a Government inquiry into streaming that despite her successes, including a Mercury Prize nomination in 2018, she struggled to pay her rent.

Shah added: ‘I am embarrassed to talk about these issues publicly. I am embarrassed to talk about them for many reasons, because money to an extent is an indication of success.

‘But here that is not really the case with me because I am a successful musician I am just not being paid fairly for the work that I make.

‘Transparency? Like I said, often artists are encouraged not to ask these questions. I don’t think there is enough transparency, no, but the bottom line for me is that what is transparent is that I am not being paid and it’s the same for my fellow musicians.’

Spotify recently introduced a function where fans can donate to their favourite artists through a so-called ‘tip jar’ on their page.

Shah said she thought it was ‘insanely condescending’ and saw it as ‘an admission of sorts by that platform which says, ‘we know that you are not making enough’.’

The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee is looking into the effects of the revenue model on artists. Above, Nadine Shah at the Mercury Prize Albums of the Year in 2018

She said she did not want to come across like she was ‘cap in hand’, but said she believed the move was ‘an admission that this system is not working for us’.

She was speaking alongside Elbow frontman Guy Garvey who warned the current streaming system threatens the future of music in the UK.

The 46-year-old singer and BBC 6 Music presenter appeared alongside Radiohead guitarist Ed O’Brien and singer-songwriter Shah to give evidence into the effects of streaming on the music industry and record labels.

He told MPs that ‘tomorrow’s music’ was at risk of being lost because many artists were unable to pay their rent or living costs.

There has been increased scrutiny of the business models of platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and Google Play after artist revenue from live performance was hit by Covid-19.

The Musicians’ Union and Ivors Academy have described streaming royalties as ‘woefully insufficient’.

Elbow frontman Guy Garvey warned the current streaming system threatens the future of music in the UK

According to the Broken Record campaign, artists receive around 16% of the total income from streams, while record companies receive around 41% and streaming services around 29%.

Garvey, whose band is best known for songs including One Day Like This, said: ‘It’s not true that great art finds its audience. This is the reason I got involved in these proceedings. I have been ‘new music’, albeit some time ago when Elbow first started putting records out.

‘We were lucky enough to work with record labels that got us from bedrooms and garages to a Mercury nomination on our first album. The reason I have come here today, and I can speak for Ed and Nadine here as well, is that the system as it is is threatening the future of music.

‘That sounds very dramatic but if musicians can’t afford to pay the rent, if they can’t afford to live, we haven’t got tomorrow’s music in place.’

O’Brien, 52, said unfairness within the music industry had only worsened with the advent of streaming technology.

He told MPs: ‘The era I was signed with Radiohead, I was signed in ’91 and I call that the analogue era.

‘We have got this analogue model that had huge imbalance and unfairness. It’s interesting to see your reactions to the testimonies this morning.

‘You are becoming aware of the unfairness and the opaqueness in the business. Then you are bolting on this digital model and it’s not working.’

Radiohead guitarist Ed O’Brien said unfairness within the music industry had only worsened with the advent of streaming technology

Shah said the intricacies of how artists were paid through streaming remained ‘alien’ to many musicians, despite its importance to their income.

Speaking from a recording studio in Brixton, south London, Garvey told MPs the model was ‘almost a miracle’ because of the choice it gave listeners, but that it would only become a true miracle if musicians were equitably paid for their work.

He suggested that equitable remuneration, where performers have a right to receive a share without reference to their label contracts, would go some way in giving musicians a larger portion of streaming revenue.

He also argued music fans wanted to know their music was ‘ethically sourced’ and a fair proportion of money was going to the artist.

Tom Gray, a member of the Mercury Prize-winning band Gomez, told MPs that streaming had made inequities in the music industry ‘more profound’.

He also suggested less well-known artists have suffered more than well-established ones due to the introduction of streaming.

He said: ‘I am not here to argue for Paul McCartney to get more money. Far from it. This is happening while a few multinational corporations, foreign-based corporations, are making the most money, the best growth, the best profit margins, they have ever made in their history.’

Addressing the committee, he said: ‘If we rebalance, this money goes into the UK economy. It goes into UK PLC. It goes into every single one of your constituencies.

‘It seems like a bit of a no-brainer as far as I am concerned. We need to protect our talent pipeline. We need to protect these people on quite modest incomes.

‘We shouldn’t change this because of Covid, far from it. But what Covid has done is that it has provided an opportunity for us to really see what we are making from recorded music and it is pretty horrific.’

Source: Read Full Article