Boy put in foster care when his grandparents could have cared for him
Judge slams Kent social services bosses for putting baby boy into foster care while grandparents who could have looked after him hadn’t even been told he had been born
- Judge Mary Lazarus complained about a ‘wide-ranging composite set of failings’
- She also said lawyers, and guardian for the boy, had to bear a share of the blame
- The boy is now 15 months old so will not be transferred from his foster carers
Judge Mary Lazarus slammed social services bosses for placing a boy in the care of foster parents when his grandparents didn’t know he had been born
Council social services bosses have come under fire from a family court judge after a little boy was placed with foster carers when grandparents who might have offered a home were unaware he had been born.
Judge Mary Lazarus has complained about a ‘wide-ranging composite set of failings’ by staff at Kent County Council.
She also said lawyers involved, and a guardian appointed to represent the boy, had to bear a share of the blame.
The judge has concluded that the boy, whose mother has mental health difficulties, should stay with the couple who are fostering him.
She said the child, now around 15 months old, has settled well in a loving home and is thriving.
But she said if the boy’s mother’s parents had known of his existence they would ‘at the very least’ have been considered as carers.
She said they had been placed in an ‘unfair situation’ which should never have arisen.
Detail of the case has been outlined in a written ruling published by Judge Lazarus.
She had analysed evidence at a private family court hearing in Bromley, south London, a few weeks ago.
The judge said the family involved could not be identified.
Pensioner, 69, ‘who identifies as a 45-year-old’ begins…
Fifteen children as young as 12 and six adults ‘from…
Senior children’s home worker ‘used his friendship with…
Share this article
‘This was indeed a situation that should never have arisen, on a number of fronts,’ said Judge Lazarus in her ruling.
‘It represents a wide-ranging composite set of failings on the part of the local authority, its social work child protection and adult mental health teams, the legal representatives of all the parties, the children’s guardian and the court.’
The judge said the boy’s maternal grandparents should have been told of his birth and assessed as care candidates before he was placed with foster carers.
She said ‘at the very least’ their position would have been ‘included in any consideration’ of the case.
But she concluded that the boy should stay at his foster home ‘notwithstanding the unfair situation’ his grandparents had been placed in.
Judge Lazarus blamed Kent County Council for a ‘wide-ranging composite set of failings’
Judge Lazarus said the boy’s welfare was her ‘paramount concern’.
The judge said he had ‘bonded and settled very well’ with his foster carers, who had provided a loving home where he had ‘thrived’.
She said moving the boy to his grandparents’ home would disrupt his life and ‘pose an unacceptable risk of traumatic and damaging distress’.
Judge Lazarus said he would stay in contact with his mother, her parents and other maternal relatives
She said the boy’s mother had ‘long-standing’ mental health problems and said his father was ‘unknown’.
Source: Read Full Article