‘Industrial-scale rort’: Plan to end the government pork barrel

Save articles for later

Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.

A Labor-led inquiry into a string of grant programs used by the Morrison government to channel money into marginal seats has backed an overhaul of the allocation system that would inhibit the current government to pork-barrel its way to victory.

The report by the parliament’s joint House and Senate audit committee found ministers were not “gods” who could do as they like when it came to grant allocations, labelling the behaviour of the previous government as “egregious”.

It said much more transparency in the process was vital to ensure taxpayers got value for money and the public retained faith in the operation of government.

Ringwood railway station car park in suburban Melbourne. It was one of those at the centre of the car park program examined by joint parliamentary committee.Credit: Paul Jeffers

Under its recommendations, ministers would have to publicly and promptly report when they funded a project against departmental advice, competitive processes would be the default system to award public monies, election promises would be clearly defined and guidelines for grants would be severely tightened.

The committee examined six separate funds: the Commuter Car Park Fund, the Building Better Regions Fund, the Safer Communities program, the Urban Congestion Fund, the Regional Growth Fund and the Modern Manufacturing Initiative.

The funds, worth a combined $7.2 billion, came under heavy scrutiny through a series of auditor-general reports or special investigations that found in many cases grants had favoured Coalition-held seats or those targeted by the Coalition.

Committee chair, Labor MP Julian Hill, said the Morrison government had engaged in “industrial-scale” rorting of grant programs in a bid to improve its chances of re-election.

He said with tens of thousands of grants worth tens of billions of dollars allocated each year, it was vital to increase public trust in the processes used to award those grants.

“It is simply not good enough for those trying to defend the egregious behaviour revealed through the inquiry to say ‘no illegality was identified’ when assessment processes were repeatedly, systematically and systemically perverted,” he said.

Julian Hill’s committee examining government grant programs has found “egregious” behaviour by the Morrison government.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

“Especially so when funding decisions repeatedly resulted in ridiculously partisan outcomes.

“Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should. Dismissing legitimate criticism of the Liberals’ industrial scale rorting of grant programs as ‘politically motivated’ is peak irony.”

The inquiry found the allocation of $4.8 billion under the Urban Congestion Fund was “completely unacceptable”. Of 154 grants, 136 worth $2.7 billion were funnelled to Coalition-held electorates, 26 worth $954 million to Labor-held seats and one each to a Green-held and independent-held seat.

It also found the Regional Growth Fund, worth $272 million, was “completely rorted” by the Coalition which received $261 million of the program. The Labor-held seat of Lingiari, which the Coalition believed it could win at the 2022 election, received the other $11 million.

The committee argued there were cases for the use of non-competitive grants while it also backed the ability of a minister to reject a project proposal from departmental officials.

But it recommended much more transparency around ministerial decisions, including the timely online publication of grant approvals. It called for recommendations to support or reject a grant be attached to all individual projects rather than “pooling” them together.

Submissions supporting a project after the cut-off for appraisal should be blocked from influencing a decision.

In recent years, ministers have been able to use a catch-all “other factors” criteria to support projects. The committee said this must be tightened, with a clear definition of what these other factors may cover.

It also recommended the Australian National Audit Office re-examine the report of government grants next year.

Coalition members of the committee backed its recommendations but noted the audit office had not found evidence of illegality by ministers of public officials through its investigation.

They also said members of the public service had to take responsibility for some of the shortcomings in grant allocations, arguing that bureaucrats had to ensure their political superiors understood the policies and guidelines underpinning grant programs.

“The second key observation from the evidence provided to the committee is that ministers had been let down in the advice and support they received from public sector officials on the administration of grants,” they said.

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.

Most Viewed in Politics

From our partners

Source: Read Full Article