Brett Sutton lauded as calm leader in Victoria’s public health storm
Save articles for later
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.
Brett Sutton, the chief health officer who advised Australia’s most severe and bitterly contested COVID-19 response, leaves Victoria’s health system better placed to confront the next pandemic.
Sutton’s resignation as the state’s chief health officer to take up a senior role with the CSIRO brings to an end a tumultuous four years as Victoria’s most senior public health official that spanned the COVID-19 pandemic and elevated a previously, little known physician and health bureaucrat to one of the state’s most recognisable figures.
Sutton has been a controversial figure during the pandemic, attracting criticism over his pursuit of COVID-zero. But on Friday, his supporters lauded his calm leadership, and public health experts pointed to a broader, long-term legacy from his time in the job.
At the height of his popularity, when Sutton convinced the Andrews government to take bold, pre-emptive action to contain the spread of the coronavirus and Victoria crushed its initial outbreaks with minimal loss of life, his face was printed on tea-towels and embroidered on pillows.
As the virus seeped back into the community through breaches in hotel quarantine, outbreaks turned deadly in federally regulated aged care centres, and the social and economic costs of Victoria’s stay-at-home orders and school and business closures began to mount, Sutton received death threats, was bailed up in public places and in at least one instance, harassed at his family home.
Sutton spoke on Friday of the enormous weight he felt in ordering disruptions to people’s lives and livelihoods and the “barrage of lies” he confronted on social media about the virus, vaccines and his public health orders. He has previously said he faced only horrible choices.
Brett Sutton speaking to the media in May 2021.Credit: Getty Images
“I was in the midst of that beast for a long time,” he said. “On the one hand it has helped me to grow personally and professionally. On the other hand, it nearly crushed me. It certainly weighed upon my family life. I don’t want them to have to carry that the same way ever again. They won’t.
“It’s the cumulative 16-hour days, it’s sprinting for six months without a day off, and you can throw in the vitriol and the death threats and the intrusions and the kind of barrage of lies that you see. As much as you can set it aside, it still weighs on you because it is directed so vociferously in your direction.”
Sutton also conceded he had some regrets about how Victoria’s response unfolded, including around the shutting of playgrounds.
“I think knowing what we know [now] about the risk of transmission, indoors versus outdoors, the freedoms that we could allow outdoors are clearly greater,” he said.
Bourke Street in Melbourne’s CBD in late 2020.Credit: Wayne Taylor
But he was adamant the government always sought to protect Victorians.
“Look, there shouldn’t be a person in the world who’s been part of the public health response, who wouldn’t reflect on things that they would do differently, things that they regret. I’m absolutely no different in that regard,” Sutton said.
“We acted with the understanding and information that we had at the time, with the best of intentions, and with an eternally focused eye on protecting the health and wellbeing of Victorians.”
Tony Blakely, a University of Melbourne epidemiologist who is chairing a royal commission into New Zealand’s COVID-19 response, helped develop the elimination strategy that Sutton and Premier Daniel Andrews embraced in 2020 as the way out of Victoria’s second wave epidemic.
Blakely credits Sutton, in part, with the government’s later decisions to redefine the role and powers of the chief health officer and decentralise the state’s public health resources.
Under the state’s pandemic laws, which then-health minister Martin Foley said Sutton helped shape, the chief health officer’s advice is published but the minister wields the power to order people to stay home or close schools.
“In a situation where a pandemic is affecting all of society and is no longer just a health issue, it is no longer appropriate for a chief health officer to have those type of powers,” Blakely said. “Under [Sutton’s] watch we saw a transference back to what a democracy is about; elected politicians having the final say.”
Finn Romanes, a public health physician who has worked alongside Sutton in Victoria’s health department for a decade, said his colleague also played an important role in pushing for the establishment of local public health units, a reform that has transformed Victoria’s approach to managing COVID and other communicable diseases.
“He has been incredibly supportive of broadening the public system, building the workforce and trying to get action at the local level,” said Romanes, now the director of the Western Public Health Unit. “There wasn’t an established playbook when COVID arrived. Brett is an exceptional public health professional who recognised the profound threat and danger proposed by COVID, probably before anyone else.
“He has always shown the deepest consideration for our community’s health and Brett made sure that we took clear, evidence-based, decisive action when it was needed.”
Allen Cheng, the director of infectious diseases at Monash Health, has experienced some of the pressure Sutton faced during the worst periods of the pandemic. At the peak of Victoria’s second wave epidemic, Cheng served as one of Sutton’s deputies and occasionally stood in for him as CHO. “This is very much public service,” he said. “I only had a small taste of his world but jeez, it is hard work.
“You feel like you are the fulcrum. Everyone is trying to tell you what to do, you are having robust discussions with business, government, the rest of your department and the Commonwealth government. All the pressure just gets funnelled through one spot. There is so much pressure, you are getting it from everywhere, and he was so calm and methodical throughout that time.”
Then-deputy CHO Allen Cheng addresses the media in 2020 as Premier Daniel Andrews watches on.Credit: Joe Armao
Early in the pandemic, when Cheng was working at The Alfred hospital, he called Sutton to tell him a mechanic for the McLaren Formula 1 team, who was in town for the grand prix, had tested positive. The next morning, Sutton cancelled the event as patrons were lining up outside the Albert Park gates.
“Brett had said if there were any cases diagnosed among the crew, they would call it off,” Cheng said. “I had to call them on the Thursday night saying we’d picked up a positive case in one of the crew. There was silence on the end of the phone.”
Sutton’s relationship with the Andrews government was complex, occasionally strained and ultimately contributed to his decision to cut short what he once described as his dream job.
Sutton’s press conference on Friday was his first since last August. Since then, dozens of media requests to interview Sutton about vaccine boosters, emerging variants or public health issues unrelated to COVID-19 have been rejected by his health department minders, at the direction of the premier’s office.
“The job has really changed,” a public health colleague with knowledge of the situation said. “Access is absolutely controlled, they don’t want him anywhere near the media, ever. He is not happy with it.”
Although Sutton stood next to Andrews for most of the daily press conferences used by the government to provide information on case numbers, outbreaks and changes in public health policy through the COVID crisis, the premier did not return the favour on Friday.
Instead, Andrews issued a tweet: “For more than a decade, Professor Sutton has served our state and guided us through some of the most difficult times. As CHO, Brett helped keep us informed, and above all, safe. Thank you for your service, and all the very best for your next role.”
Michael O’Brien led the state opposition at the start of the pandemic and said before the introduction of new laws requiring the CHO’s advice about pandemic orders to be published, it was difficult to know where Sutton’s advice ended and the government’s political considerations began.
“He was put in a very difficult position,” O’Brien said on Friday. “These things don’t come with instruction manuals, but I certainly got the sense there wasn’t a broader consideration of the public interest taken on a lot of these decisions.
“Everything was done quite secretly and when we asked questions publicly, we were attacked for undermining public health. I had deep suspicions that political factors weighed heavily on what we were told was the health advice. Occasionally, a bit of daylight would sneak in.”
The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.
Most Viewed in National
From our partners
Source: Read Full Article