Sentence for New Year’s Eve terror plotter lenient, prosecutors say
Save articles for later
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.
Prosecutors say the 10-year jail term imposed on a man who planned a terror attack and wanted to kill New Year's revellers at Federation Square is inadequate, and have called on Victoria's Court of Appeal to increase the sentence.
Ali Khalif Shire Ali intended to use an AK-47 assault rifle and up to 210 rounds of ammunition to kill as many people as he could in the name of Islamic State as the clock ticked down to midnight on December 31, 2017. Anti-terrorism police thwarted his plan when they arrested him five weeks before the intended attack.
Ali Khalif Shire Ali was arrested in November 2017.Credit:Joe Armao
"I am just going hard until they shoot me," the then IT student told undercover police at a meeting in Coburg in 2017.
Shire Ali, 23, was in May jailed for 10 years – he is required to serve 7½ years before being eligible for parole – after he pleaded guilty to intentionally doing an act in preparation for or planning a terrorist act.
He was in prison when his older brother, Hassan, killed much-loved restaurant owner Sisto Malaspina in the Bourke Street terror attack on November 9, 2018.
Hassan Khalif Shire Ali stabbed Mr Malaspina, the owner of Pellegrini's Espresso Bar, and injured two other men before he was fatally shot by police.
Ali Khalif Shire Ali has served almost three years of his prison term since his arrest, but prosecutors argue the sentence Supreme Court judge John Champion set this year was manifestly inadequate.
In written submissions to the Court of Appeal, prosecutor Pat Doyle said the sentence did not reflect the gravity of Shire Ali's crime, which carried an intention to inflict mass casualties and a high level of planning, spanning from 2016 to the time of his arrest. He met with undercover operatives who he thought could get him the AK-47, but he never got the gun.
The charge Shire Ali pleaded guilty to carries a maximum penalty of life in prison.
"When due consideration is given to these matters, a head sentence of 10 years imprisonment stands out as unduly lenient, and a failure properly to exercise the sentencing discretion at first instance can be inferred," Mr Doyle wrote in his submissions.
Mr Doyle told the court the level of Shire Ali's planning included consideration of where he would stand and how he would conceal the gun in a bag, and an intention to begin firing during the countdown to midnight, when Federation Square was at its busiest and revellers were most vulnerable.
But Shire Ali's lawyers say the sentencing judge was well aware of how serious the offending was, as Justice Champion described the crime as evil, horrifying in its potential, despicable and random.
Defence counsel Dermot Dann, QC, wrote in submissions that a sentence had to consider Shire Ali's guilty plea, remorse, his lack of prior offending, his ongoing support from his family and his positive prospects for rehabilitation.
The Shire Ali brothers were both radicalised by Islamic State, but before Ali Khalif was sentenced he renounced his devotion and said he now hated the terror organisation because of his brother's death.
Mr Dann said it was reasonably open for Justice Champion to reach the sentence he did and called on the Court of Appeal to dismiss the challenge.
Court of Appeal judges Chris Maxwell, Mark Weinberg and Stephen McLeish reserved their decision.
Get our Morning & Evening Edition newsletters
The most important news, analysis and insights delivered to your inbox at the start and end of each day. Sign up here.
Most Viewed in National
Source: Read Full Article